Why I'm not bothered by the BCS
Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 10:45PM I've always remained pretty quiet when hanging around college football
fans who target their anger towards the BCS. Part of that's just
me, I tend to not really say much when I don't really care much for the
argument. Part of it's because I have an opinion very much
different from the more outspoken fans.
That opinion is that I like college football's status quo. In
fact, I preferred its antebellum days, when we went with the two
polls---Associated Press and Coaches---to determine team rankings and
bowl matchups. In most years, the poll outcomes were never in
much dispute, harmonious and not worth any kind of fuss.
Obviously, times changed and with the game's continued growth, the
money men of the sport took advantage of fan frustration at a few messy
poll outcomes and crafted the Bowl Alliance and later the Bowl
Championship Series. It was a halfway measure meant to quell the
masses while creating cash-cow megabowls.
Such a system, by its nature a compromise, isn't exactly anything to be
excited about, but it's made for some major end-of-year matchups that
we might not have otherwise seen.
Some of the real problems rest in the creation of so many bowl
games. Around half of the teams in D-1 are now playing in some
kind of end-of-year bowl, which combined with the prominence of the Big
Four (Rose, Orange, Fiesta, Sugar) bowls, has diminished the value of
some of the game's more established and celebrated games like the
Cotton and Gator bowls. I'm very much in favor of bowl games, but
they become a lot more valuable if there are less of them being played
and thus better teams and better matchups are played within them.
My argument has always sided towards remaining with the bowl
games. The bowls are such a fascinating and unique tradition,
often pairing unlikely opponents that test fans' beliefs in their
team/conference/regional superiority. And it creates great travel
opportunities for the players and fans. I love them, and they're
what make college football so great, because the tradition aspect is
what really separates college football from all other sports on the
American landscape. It's why you're here, in some aspect, reading
this website. You root for some school and are loyal to it not
just because you were born into it, but because you believe in its
mythology, its symbolism, its victory over bitter rivals, and because
the wider game itself has some kind of appeal.
That's the draw of tradition. The bowls are, in my heart and
mind, a permanent feature of that tradition. Without the bowls,
the college game loses so much of its appeal.
So when I hear people argue for some kind of a playoff, I cringe and
wonder if maybe we're getting away from the real purpose of the
game. College football, bless its soul, has a ridiculously brief
season, usually 11 games and if a team's lucky, a 12th game in some
kind of bowl. The weeks approach and pass in furious order.
But what's great about the season is that because there are so few
games and such a great bowl reward potential at the end, that literally
every week matters. There is such tension and drama in the
week-to-week happenings all across America. No other sport has
that aspect.
Creating some kind of playoff, to myself and in the long run a lot of
fans, would kill so much of the game's appeal. Perhaps we're all
being a bit short-sighted here in our quest to reach some kind of
"final" outcome. Again, I've always enjoyed the frustration of
things like split national championships. It's fun to see
disparate fan bases argue until the cows come home about who really was
the best. That's part of what keeps us watching the games.
We need the uncertainty. It's in this imperfection that college
football has attained such a nirvana-like appeal to so many fans.
And now many of us want to tinker with that.
Now, some have said that the playoff could function within the bowl
setup. I say hogwash. Fans would see right through that as
some kind of diminishment of the bowls. Imagine the first round
of the playoffs somehow being an "Holiday Bowl" and "Gator Bowl" for
the rights to play the next round in the Rose Bowl or Fiesta Bowl or
what have you. How bizarre is that? To me that looks like
chaos and an unnecessary change to how college football has always been
run.
So, having a choice between what looks like an unnecessary and
diminishing future option and the curent tangled, confusing and perhaps
unfair but intriguing system, I choose the former.
Long live the bowls.






Reader Comments (2)
http://www.bruinsnation.com
We are going to put you on our blog roll. It would be great if you can return the favor. Thanks!