« Premature Evaluation, Part I | Main | Taking Care of No. 1 »

Brass in Pocket, Steel(e) in Hand

Posted on Tuesday, June 13, 2006 at 10:55AM by Registered CommenterCFR in , | Comments6 Comments

Yesterday finally tracked down a copy of college football's Bible and Poor Richard's Almanac all rolled into one, the Phil Steele 2006 College Football Preview.  Many thanks to regular reader Solon for pointing me towards a Waldenbooks store that had a copy.  May Barnes & Noble and Books a Million burn in hell for either 1)not carrying it or 2)not releasing it until its scheduled release date today---the jackals.

Anyway, it's here and I can stop fretting about it.

I started reading the Steele magazine a few years ago when I realized the smartest, most hardcore college football fans I knew (and their friends as well) all had copies and religiously retained and referenced them.  It was a bit intimidating at first because unlike other preview magazines its not as flashy and glossy and takes a few moments to get used to.  As the cover says, it's "Jampacked with Information" and Steele tends to write in his own unique language.  Not a page is turned without a reference to VHT's or him saying "simply".

People tend to like his prognostications and give weight to them.  I'm not as heavily interested in his crystal-ball skills, but they're not bad.  Last year for example he remarkably left Iowa and Tennessee out of his preseason top 10 list.  Both were considered locks for top five but Steele abstained, dropping them to 14th and 15th.  Smooth move.  Thing is, he also was drooling over Purdue and its schedule and slotted the Boilermakers at No. 3 overall.  Oops.

Anyway, the big picture is he is good at spotting some trends and completely misses the boat on others.  What is valuable is his overall approach to examining the game.  He does his best to watch as many teams and games as possible.  He creates his own sets of "power rankings" based on various criteria like talent, schedule, returning starters, etc. and you can see those reflected in his opinions and rankings.

He may be wrong sometimes, but at least I know where he went wrong and why he felt that way.

That said, people are unhappy about his prognostications this year.  Can't say I blame them.  I think the warning signs came when I couldn't find a copy anywhere in town and then HP called me over the weekend to complain something to the effect of "Steele's lost his mind".

Anyway, Steele gets a pass here.  The book is too valuable regardless of his prognostications.  My older copies are tattered and frayed, hanging on for dear life because they've been opened and closed so many thousands of times as I hunted down data from within the pages.  At its heart the Steele guide is an invaluable resource, cutting down the time and mental strain of chasing basic college football facts around the internet.  I appreciate everything that's inside, as it's a good way to track betting trends for teams, track the relative recruiting value of their players, have a rough idea of depth charts and past performances for the individual units of the team, and so much more.

Point being, for those of you skeptical of Steele, just buy it.  The die-hards I know can't live without it and keep copies from as far back as when they started reading.  It's found a home in the offices of some of the best coaches in America (honest) and many a great fan and pundit throughout the land.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (6)

It's funny how worked up people get about the preseason mags. In a way, I guess, it's not - we write blogs, for crying out loud.

Still, it's good column fodder, especially when they say outlandish things that (sell magazines) provoke discussion.

Placing OU at the top, in my case, had me scratching my head.
June 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterPeter Bean
Well, you see where I've got Oklahoma right now---14th so your confusion is warranted.
June 13, 2006 | Registered CommenterCFR
I think what really sets Phil's preview apart is the attention given to teams outside of the Top-25 and outside of the BCS conferences. It doesn’t matter if your contending for the SEC Title or in the bottom of the Sun Belt, you still get 2 pages of analysis and program history. As someone who runs a blog for a non-BCS team (Navy) I have come to really appreciate the Mid-Major type programs, and look forward to see what the experts have to say about the MWC, WAS, MAC, Conf-USA, and God help me even the Sun Belt (although that may be pushing it).

I can tell you that many Navy fans were excited about the outlook Phil had in the preview (hovering around 10 wins), and were ecstatic over being slated at 30 in his preseason list. Many were upset Rob Caldwell was listed as the 42nd Best Outside Linebacker in the country after his 140 tackle performance last season (2nd Best returning). It’s little things like that which really lead to some great discussion amongst fans.

Now the big boys in the SEC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10, and the ACC can fight over Top 25 positioning all they want in a PRESEASON MAGAZINE, but the fact that the smaller programs are recognized and, in classic Phil fashion, recognized with a positive, "could/should be better" spin, is why I love this 328 page magazine.

Enjoy the previews CFR, 6 days later I’ve still got my head buried in the magazine.

June 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterAdam
I feel like I need to buy it because it is so recommended. I usually pine for the Sporting News and I got my copy just the other day.

Need some help...beyond Steele, Sporting News, Street and Smith, Lindy's, and Athlon, what are some other respectable guides.

I am working on an aggregate ranking based on all the pubs.
June 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterHeath
Note: BoilerMAKERS, not Boilers. It's an engineering school. That's why the logo is a train: they make the boilers.
June 13, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterCMGayley
Noted re: Boilermakers. It's just shorthand.

Heath I think you nailed all the big preseason mags, no other ones I can think of, although sometimes there are some rinky-dink upstarts you can find at smaller magazine vendors.

Here's a good link of a site that reviews the preseason magazines:

http://preseason.stassen.com/

Adam, yeah a few days is nothing, it's good year-round and as a great reference looking back on expectations and whatnot. My old and current copies are never far from my computer when I'm working on CFR.
June 13, 2006 | Registered CommenterCFR

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.