The Football Major?
I don't agree, but we can at least table it:
Let's get serious, folks. Most of the players who fill football and basketball rosters at Division One schools are NOT legitimate students. Many would not be at their universities were it not for their athletic ability.
There are entrance requirements for regular students and then there are the entrance requirements for athletes. There is usually a huge gap between the two.
Now, in my book, there is nothing wrong with that. What's wrong is that we try to pretend that there's no difference.
We celebrate the concept of the student-athlete and expect players with NFL talent to also do well in useless (to them) majors like sociology or public policy and management.
I say it's time we cut all this nonsense out.
If you are football player, you should be able to major in football.
After all, if you are a gifted cello player, you come to a music school to major in cello. Why can't Brandon Cox major in quarterback?
Heisman Pundit makes a good case for his proposal, noting that football players with football or sports-related majors are not all that different from people with music majors etc. They're following a curriculum that involves practice and an understanding of their field of study.
It would certainly abate some of the childish crowing about the great numbers of sociology, human development and basket weaving majors found within the rolls of major football teams.
Personally, I hope athletes would pursue more traditional majors and continue the facade of "student-athletes". But there's something very libertarian and realist about HP's proposal that I cannot ignore.
As it is we're setting up many a young man and woman to fail with the status quo, pigeonholing them into pursuits they may not give a hoot about if not for needing a degree to stay eligible.
At least with more realistic degree options an extra ounce of choice is inserted into the process, and an athlete can pursue his or her true interest and calling and suffer the consequences if they fail along the way. That's life. For whatever reason there's a strong impulse within society to regulate a great amount of behavior and outcomes instead of letting people chase their interests right or wrong. Perhaps a football (or athletics/sports) major is a check against that impulse.
I'm reminded of the story of former Notre Dame tight end Joey Hiben who ditched the football program to pursue a degree in the ultra-demanding architecture program. To his credit the kid made an interesting choice and will face the consequences of that decision. I think he was smart, as it's almost impossible to balance such a demanding pursuit with the demands of year-round football at major programs like Notre Dame. He didn't choose football, but many others do, and it's a touch unfair to demand of them a pursuit they may not have great interest in.






Reader Comments (18)
The football players who should be majoring in football are going to be ok. They are the ones who will be in the pros, making bank, and at least having a chance at a better life because of athletics. The problem with this idea is that it will cause many kids, especially those that are highly touted, to take on a useless degree path expecting to get to the league. Sure, some of them are wasting their time majoring in psychology or something, but at least if football doesn't work out, they HAVE a degree. Maybe they can become PE teachers or something, but if they have a football degree, they are Grade A screwed. Where's the need?
As far PSUMike's comments, at some point you have to force the players to take some responsibility about their future. Coaches, administrators, parents, etc should be giving good guidance, but there is only so much that can be done. If the player is not motivated to go to class and get a education, then no amount of cajoling on the part of the administration is going to change things. If anything, continuously providing "help" to pass academic classes only cheapens the major for all of those students who actually did the work.
There is no "cello" major, yet there ARE sports/phys ed majors. Football is a subject - not a major - and a college degree is to prepare you for life, not a single subject. I was a geophysics major, but it didn't mean I didn't have to take English, History, Classics, etc. To rearrange the entire accreditation process, because that's what it would take, just so that a tiny minority of players could move more easily into the NFL while remaining essentially illiterate would be a crime.
There IS a class-less way to get into the NFL. Sit 3 years playing with your XBox after you finish highschool then enter the draft. Do you think that's what the NFL wants?
Non-football classes develop the mind in ways that make smart football players and smart football players play better. If someone's dumb as a post and can't pass a class, the NFL will still be there after 3 years - only the dumb player is going to be going up against smart players equally talented. If you were the NFL, who would you pick?
College is whatever each university makes of it.
I'm a little less absolute about statements like "college football is not about getting to the NFL". For a decent amount of these guys (upwards of 230-300 in each graduating class) it is.
I'd rather have these guys study something relevant and important while enrolled, but again that should be their choice whether to do so or not, it shouldn't be force-fed to them.
I am referring to the Major portion of the degree. Why should someone who has spent his entire life in a field and who wants to one day work in that field be forced to take another major?
What's more, he is forced to take that major not for the purpose of bettering him, but more often than not just to keep him eligible.
We do not force someone majoring in Cello to also major in Economics. Nor do we force someone majoring in Sculpting to also major in Sociology.
Sure, not all college players play in the pros. But not all econ majors become Milton Friedman or John Kenneth Galbreath.
Not all history majors become Paul Johnson or Stephen Ambrose.
That's why we have the teaching profession. If football players don't make it in a pro league, their major can prepare them for a variety of tasks--being a trainer, a coach, a gym teacher, a nutritionist, and so on.
Instead, we stick our heads in the sand and pretend that these athletes are getting educated. Not even close.
Leave it to Cody to provide the comic relief.
Out of how many thousands that leave universities each year? Universities are not day care for dreamers. As for some pathetic institution offering a "Cello" major, if that's the case let's just dumb the whole system down to the least common denominator and give degrees to anyone that wants to show up. USC doesn't do this, don't know what trailer park school being given as an example in the other comment. USC also doesn't offer underwater basketweaving as a major.
Should they allow women's lacrosse to be a major as well?
The comment about "hard majors" not guaranteeing a job either is also kind of lame. If you have an engineering degree - you might not wind up an engineer - but you dang sure are qualified for a whole lot of other jobs. Football major? Not so much.
There is already Journalism, Medicine, Sociology, Business and such that can be applied in the area of sports if a player wishes. Sports Journalism, Sports Medicine, Sports Sociology, Sports Business. Just take the classes. This would give the NFL flop a way out. Even Phys Ed offers the opportunity to be competitive for jobs in education.
Someone headed to the NFL has no God given right to a university diploma they didn't earn. They can still play in the NFL. Are they as competitive? No. So what. Same can be said for a person wanting to be an executive for a Fortune 500 company. It's a lot harder without a good diploma, so should we give every kid with this dream an easy diploma just so he can apply at Citigroup?
Athletes aren't the only group inwhich some can't make it through a university education. Non-athletes in this situation don't get admitted at all. It just boils my hide when people want to dumb something down for those who can't hack it. A degree is not necessary for entry into the NFL.
I hate to break it to you, but USC does offer a Cello major... sort of. It's just called "Strings".
At the USC Thornton School of Music there are also majors in "Studio/Jazz Guitar", "Keyboard Studies", "Classical Guitar", "Scoring for Motion Pictures & Television" and many others---complete list here:
http://www.usc.edu/schools/music/programs/
There's a reason USC is derisively nicknamed "Fig Tech" by UCLA fans, at its core USC is a trade school more than a liberal arts school (thus the strong schools in public policy, journalism, dentistry, pharmacy, music, etc.).
I believe HP's argument is that a football major could be legit, involving studies of coaching, organizational management, business, dealing with media and agents and the financial end of the game, etc. Sports is a business and a trade just like everything else in this world if we can ever get over our biases against athletics and realize as much.
No, it's not exactly as mind-numbing as plugging away feverishly for 4-5 years getting an EE or Architecture degree, but it's purpose is the same: to provide necessary education in a field that people seek to enter.