"Spend a few minutes reading College Football Resource" - Whit Watson, Sun Sports

"Maybe you should start your own blog" - Bruce Feldman, ESPN

"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)

"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built

"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports

Top Teams 2008

After Week Seven

  1. Alabama
  2. Penn State
  3. Texas
  4. Oklahoma
  5. Florida
  6. USC
  7. Georgia
  8. LSU
  9. BYU
  10. Missouri
  11. Ohio State
  12. Oklahoma State
  13. Texas Tech
  14. Utah
  15. Kansas
  16. USF
  17. North Carolina
  18. Miami
  19. Boise State
  20. Georgia Tech
Display
RSS
Search CFR
Submission Corner
« Introducing: The Portal | Main | That's Gonna Hurt »
Friday
Aug042006

Friday Roundup

---CFN's Pete Fiutak actually makes sense for once, writing about college football's recent scandals.  His argument: they're college kids.  Damn right they are, so don't act surprised or morally indignant when these things happen.

I understand my recent opinions about these types of situations are ruffling some feathers.  But understand that college athletics is one of the only fields other than joining the clergy or social work where financial gain and reward is strictly discouraged.  At least the other two have legitimate reasons for their self-denial.  What's the NCAA's excuse?

It's just a little annoying that partisans get in the way of a good fight with the NCAA.  Eventually we as fans should be able to sort these issues out individually instead of collectively.  When that happens many of the rules start to look like garbage (which they are).  Don't we all feel a little stupid for lumping a cheater (USC's Ryan Ting who failed a steroid test) with someone who did not violate any conceivable law (Oklahoma's Rhett Bomar and his sweetheart deal with the dealership)?  And then within these, we have to parse what is troubling with a program (there's been no valid accusation that USC supplied Ting with steroids) and what's simply individual irresponsibility and rule-breaking?

I acknowledge that so long as the rules are in place, people should follow them.  Absolutely.  But to not publicly mount a challenge to the dumb rules is insane.  Right now the mood in the college football world is that the Ting situation is on par with the Bomar situation which is on par with the Miami situation and so on.  They're all scandals when in reality not every scandal's the same and not every rule broken is really much of a crime.  We aren't at that stage of moral clarity yet as a college football public and my efforts on here are simply a gentle nudge in that direction.

---The preseason USA Today coaches poll is out.  Ohio State is first, Texas second, and Notre Dame and USC are tied for third.  And whaddya know, Ohio State and Texas play in just a few weeks, and Notre Dame and USC meet in November.  Too cool.

---The steady drum-beat about NCAA rule 3-2-5-e continues.  The Wiz has the latest from Purdue's Joe Tiller, Idaho's Dennis Erickson and other WAC coaches.

Says Tiller:

"Why don't we just come out and say we want to shorten the game so we can get more TV commercials in?" Tiller asked. "Let's not say it's going to make the game faster and the fans are going like it."

By the Wiz's estimate, an average of anywhere from 20-25 plays will be lost in each game played this season.  For the die hards watching at home that means less football.  Less.  Not more.  Less.  I want more football, how about you?

---ESPN's Pat Forde takes the cynical view on the latest round of offseason scandals, creating an "All Bad-Actor Team".

Quote:

If I'm running a compliance office at a major athletic power, and the star (OK, star-ting) quarterback is working at an auto dealership that has a cozy relationship with the athletic department, supplying it with comp cars, I'm already nervous. I want enough people at my disposal to physically check out work arrangements.

I'd dispatch someone to the dealership from time to time to make sure the star (OK, star-ting) quarterback was actually, you know, working. And I'd do the same with as many other athletes as possible -- especially the stars.

People want to give those guys things (houses, reportedly, if you're the parents of Reggie Bush). You'd think the school might want to know about it.

Then again, maybe the school doesn't want to know. Maybe every major athletic power is averting its eyes and holding its breath, hoping it doesn't have to be the next school to drop the disciplinary hammer in what already has been an ugly August.

And if I were President there would be world peace, no bombs and puppies and kittens for everyone.  These schools don't want to meddle in kids' work and personal lives.  I understand that it's the job of compliance staff to keep tabs on those details, but there's this whole privacy/constitution thing they have to worry about and have so far treaded quite lightly, which is why they end up with these surprises like with Reggie Bush and Rhett Bomar.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

I have no problem with the athletic office checking up on the players. The programs simply need to see it as checking on their investment in the university.

Let's face it, we bring the kids to campus because they can help our team win. We make sure their eligible, we have tutors who (the ones above board) work with them to keep them on top of their schoolwork, and we have training tables set up to condition and feed the athletes properly. If I am a business and I spend all this time recruiting my employee (again, lets not be kids here) then I am allowed to make sure everything is going okay.

August 6, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterHeath
No doubt that there are going to be stupid incidents where a college kid is just acting like many college kids would, such as taking more money then they earned at a summer job when its offered or using a fake ID to get into club/bar while underage. The common sense rule has to apply…the fake ID violation, while technically against the law, is not anything to get up in arms about and start talking about a lack of institutional control. If that's the case, then every university (and most high schools) have a problem. Its not an athletic department issue. However, Bomar's case violates the spirit of amateur and collegiate athletics. He took money that was offered because he was the quarterback at OU. He certainly was not offered the money because of some special skill set that he was bringing to the car dealership unless being able to read Division I college defenses is something that this car dealership is looking for in a low-level employee. And I'm sick of the argument offered up by many that these student-athletes should be allowed to get some of the money that they are generating for their universities. Many universities do not make money off of athletics. And those that do, are offering their high-profile athletes plenty in return. Just in the obvious case, for a student-athlete who attends a private university (a Notre Dame, Stanford, or USC), they will be given a scholarship that is worth in the neighborhood of $230K over five years. Additionally, the university is providing a myriad of services to support their athletic endeavors: training facilities, coaching, athletic clothing, medical coverage, etc. I won't attempt to put a dollar figure on these services. In addition to the athletic support, the universities provide academic support for those willing to take advantage of it, such as free tutors, additional academic guidance, class scheduling consideration, etc, that are typically not offered to "normal" students who are paying their way through college. Finally, for these high profile programs that are making the money, their student-athletes are offered probably the most valuable commodity for someone who is truly hoping to go professional: exposure. Tell me that Notre Dame and USC players do not benefit by playing for these programs. These players may not receive cash while putting on a uniform in college, but I would love to see a study that puts a dollar figure on the benefits that they receive while playing. In return, they are required to put in the hours of film study and practice, and be expected to be held to a higher standard because of their exposure. But these players would still be putting in the time to have that opportunity to play at the next level and most of these guys are loving the additional attention they receive by putting on the uniform and playing in front of thousands of cheering fans, not to mention all the adoring co-eds. I don't see why its such an indignation that they are not treated like professionals and given cash for their services.
August 8, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterFC

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.