"Spend a few minutes reading College Football Resource" - Whit Watson, Sun Sports

"Maybe you should start your own blog" - Bruce Feldman, ESPN

"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)

"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built

"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports

Top Teams 2008

After Week Seven

  1. Alabama
  2. Penn State
  3. Texas
  4. Oklahoma
  5. Florida
  6. USC
  7. Georgia
  8. LSU
  9. BYU
  10. Missouri
  11. Ohio State
  12. Oklahoma State
  13. Texas Tech
  14. Utah
  15. Kansas
  16. USF
  17. North Carolina
  18. Miami
  19. Boise State
  20. Georgia Tech
Display
RSS
Search CFR
Submission Corner
« Final AP and USA Today Rankings Released | Main | Prediction Fell Flat »
Monday
08Jan2007

Like Watching Rams Fight

I'm sure you've seen those nature programs before, with the host heading off into the wilderness to catalogue the behavior of this or that beast.  Occasionally the program happens upon some male rams in the middle of mating season, battling for the right to woo some terribly bored female.

The event isn't particularly sophisticated.  Two animals identify each other, do that whole sizing-up thing and then get to the business of butting heads.

It's violent, impressive, dimwitted and short-lived.

Enter Monday night's BCS Championship Game between Ohio State and Florida.

Each team had a great deal of time in December and January to size the other up and then the skull-bashing show began.  Florida quickly asserted itself and Ohio State spent the final 45 minutes pretending to participate but we all knew otherwise.  The collisions left Ohio State dizzy and looking for retreat.

Ideally a football game is a bit of a boxing match, with the fighters sizing each other up, offering a series of feints, jabs, hooks, crosses and the occasional haymaker.  Ideally there should be some thinking involved, some adjustment even as both sides take their licks.

This championship held no such drama.  Florida stuck to its defense and a patient underneath passing game and overwhelmed Ohio State.  The Buckeyes had no counter.  They had no jab.  They had no real punch to speak of.  Simply erasure.

Unfortunately this means the game was a dud.  Urban Meyer found something in his preparations and badly whipped the nation's No. 1 team.  For that, the Gators are champions.  Not complicated, not controversial.  But also not compelling.

At least the Gators put to rest the controversy about whether or not they deserved a place at the championship game.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (24)

"not compelling"?

Explain yourself please. I heard no such comparison when USC won the NC in a game in which they were heavily favored.

You hopeless homer!
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy
So, compelling would be to try something different when they had no need to do so to win? It was up to Ohio State to make changes and force Florida to do things differently. The Buckeyes lack of ability to do that very thing is compellingly obvious they were not all they were cracked up to be...pun intended.

Remind me not to hire you for my team should I ever become an AD.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterbrat
I can't speak for CFR, but I don't see this as a slam on Florida. He's right that there wasn't any drama; for anyone but Florida fans, the game was dull. It was one team beating up another team. If you didn't have a real interesting in the winning team (as I didn't), there wasn't much to watch.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill
Burrill, so in any lop-sided game if you're not a fan of the winning team then it's not interesting to watch? No college football fan are you.

Drama? There wouldn't have been any drama if OSU was putting a slap-down on Florida. It's what most analyst thought was going to happen.

Most of the unhappy people this morning are OSU fans and haters of the SEC.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy
Dawgy,

Don't rewrite history to try to make a point. USC was a barely favored in the 2005 NC game against OU. The spread opened at 3 and was down to 1 point (even money in some spots) by gametime. Last time I checked 1 point is not "heavily favored".

Do some research...Ohio St on the other hand was heasvily favored at 8 points.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTyler
Tyler, I don't have to do any research to ask someone to explain their post.

BTW, 8 pts. is not a heavy favorite in my opinion and, if you were to do some research you could do a better job of spelling.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy
Good analogy.

Fla showed they were prepared for the game and didn't panic after Ginn's return. They showed a lot of poise in being able to come back from that and then deliver a thorough whipping.

I will say that I did predict a Fla victory because OSU's defense just doesn't come across a diversified attack like Fla's.

OSU's LB's were abysmal in zone coverage. On 3rd and 5 type situation, they were nowhere to be found in the middle of the field near the 1st down marker. I never saw a team get so many easy 3rd and 5-7 soft tosses in the middle of the field like Fla did. Also, OSU didn't even bother rushing the passer or blitzing. Their defense didn't do anything well.

CFR, I know you've been a big Meyer-proponent, and you had me sold on Meyer. I look like a semi-genius now because I told my friends a year ago that Meyer would have Fla contending for a title in 2006, after they claimed Meyer's system wouldn't work in the SEC.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterStephen Kim
Stephen Kim, not sure what "Meyer's System" means? Does that mean a better defense?
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy
Dawgy, I am most definitely a college football fan. I go to every lopsided powder-puff non-conference football game Michigan plays. But it doesn't matter how much I love college football -- a lopsided game is bland. Once the game isn't in doubt, it's much less interesting. I enjoy being at the stadium, but the game itself is no longer interesting. It's not even a competition anymore. It's just players plodding toward a foregone conclusion. It's satisfying as an emotionally invested fan, but it's dull as just a football fan.

That idea -- once the game isn't in doubt, it's much less interesting -- holds true no matter who is favored. Once it was clear OSU wasn't going to compete, the most interesting part of the game for me as a fan of neither school was seeing how grumpy Meyer could look and how lost Tressel could look.

And for a bowl game, 8 points is a large margin. For many regular season games, 8 doesn't mean much, but bowls are supposed to be somewhat even matchups, at least moreso than many regular season games, so an 8 point margin is big. Especially for the final game between the BCS 1 and 2.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill
Burrill, "For that, the Gators are champions. Not complicated, not contraversial. But also not compelling."

Now is that saying the game was not compelling or that the Gators are not compelling?

He has already stated that in his opinion the game was a "dud". So what is not compelling?

If you want to be right about the point spreads then O.K. I'll send you your trophy.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy
Damn, the sec folks are defensive. I'm not a fan of either team, all I got out of this post was that the game was a dud, plain and simple. Out of the 3 games played in the Valley of the Sun this bowl season, the biggest game was by far the least interesting to watch from a competetive standpoint. Or do you really want to argue that last night was somehow better than the Fiesta Bowl? Or better than even the Texas Tech-Minnesota Insight Bowl? Ye gods. Even the "HAHAHAHA S3C SP33D RULZ OSU SUXORZ!!!11!11!!1" nonsense that is being spewed around the ebays this morning is a little less obnoxious.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMark
Mark, was SC - Michigan a "dud", was BYU - Oregon a "dud", was LSU - "dud"?

I didn't read on this pac(1)0 homer blog how when USC blew out Arkansas that the game was a "dud".

BTW, the SEC has some fast-ass player don't they?

January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy
Those games you listed weren't title games.

It was a dud because Fla pummelled OSU. I don't see why you are so upset about that fact.

And by "Meyer's system" I mean his offense. It didn't light the SEC up, but it was enough to go through the season to get them a title. People made it sound like Fla would lose 4 games a year using that system.

Yes, their defense is great, but their offense made plays when it needed, whether it was Tebow lowering his head for key first downs/TDs, or WR's running around like chickens with their heads cut off.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterStephen Kim
Why do think I'm upset? I simply ask a question.

As for Florida, the two years prior to Meyer the florida offense averaged more points than Meyer's offenses the last two years. The last two years the defense has given up less points than the previous two years. That's what wins my friend. Defense has always been the path for championship teams.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDawgy1
It's not about points per game, it's about consistency and efficiency. Something their offense has a lot of now.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterStephen Kim
Points per game is dictated by pace of the game and a high # of passes thrown, as much as anything.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterStephen Kim
Because you sound upset dawgy.

As a fan with no vaunted interest in either team, I didn't give a crap after the first half ended. Neither did the entire apartment of people who were also watching. It was not a compelling game (indeed this entire bowl season was pretty boring). That is not a criticism of Florida or the SEC, it is a criticism of a blowout. LSU over ND wasn't exciting, and 'SC dominating Michigan wasn't exciting for the exact same reasons.

That's all he's trying to say.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterUSCLink
"for anyone but Florida fans, the game was dull" i am not a florida fan, but enjoyed the game very much.

war eagle.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterpatrick
..almost as much as when herbstreit and corso praised the sec after the game...love watching herbie eat crow..freaking buckeyes..hehehe
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterpatrick
Dawgy, if anything, CFR was guilty of unclear phrasing and construction in that quote. He could be referring to either. The general tenor of the article seemed to me to indicate that he was saying the game was not compelling, but again, I can't speak for him.

Also, USCLink, while I agree the Rose Bowl wasn't a great game, I'm not sure it could be classified with the LSU/ND or OSU/FL blowouts. After all, it was 3-3 at the half. Michigan did flop in the second half, but the game wasn't that lopsided until later.
January 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.