"Spend a few minutes reading College Football Resource" - Whit Watson, Sun Sports

"Maybe you should start your own blog" - Bruce Feldman, ESPN

"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)

"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built

"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports

Top Teams 2008

After Week Seven

  1. Alabama
  2. Penn State
  3. Texas
  4. Oklahoma
  5. Florida
  6. USC
  7. Georgia
  8. LSU
  9. BYU
  10. Missouri
  11. Ohio State
  12. Oklahoma State
  13. Texas Tech
  14. Utah
  15. Kansas
  16. USF
  17. North Carolina
  18. Miami
  19. Boise State
  20. Georgia Tech
Display
RSS
Search CFR

« This and That | Main | Pundit Roundup »
Tuesday
27Feb

More Coming

I'm on the road which tends to cut productivity considerably.  Pundit Roundup is on the agenda and whatever other topics come to mind.

I talked to Heisman Pundit yesterday and it sounds like he'll have an entry up rather soon so that's something to look forward to as well.


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

not hot from cfn:
Michigan defensive linemen
Alan Branch, likely the first tackle taken, ripped off an impressive 33 reps of 225 pound and ran a not-that-bad 5.08 40, but he appeared to be out of shape and didn't look agile. Even so, he's still a near-lock to go in the top ten, unlike Lamarr Woodley, who didn't do anything at the Combine outside of getting measured. Rumors swirled about horrendous individual workouts
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergabe
lets hear it for the big 11 speed! After all that anti-smack talk last december about SEC speed. You're mistaken if you think we'll let this die.
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergabe
In your excitement, gabe, you managed to ignore the good showing of Leon Hall and Dave Harris.
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill
True, but if they didn't have those guys they'd be less talented than the defense at Ole Miss and Michigan is team "that got screwed out of the NC game"
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergabe
All I wanna know is, can Laamar Woodly play football? Yes. Can Laamar Woodly play football well? Yes, very well. This doing stuff/not doing stuff at combines or other "individual" workouts is starting to get ridiculous now.
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterPaxil
Hey CFR, when are you gonna do the OOC schedules for the other BCS conferences?
March 1, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRickdog
Gabe, my point was that you went from two guys not being awesome at the combine (which, as Paxil noted, isn't an unfallible measure of a player anyway) to making a broad judgment on the speed of the Big 10 -- but you did so by ignoring two other players who looked just fine at the combine.
March 2, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill
my point was that michigan's defense SLOWER SLOWER SLOWER than some of the finer SEC defenses that weren't 10-0 and ranked #2 in the nation coming into the big OSU game.

leading up to "the game of the century" which was to make the BCS game a mere trivial anti-climatic formality...most of the anit-SEC crowd was yelling about how they didn't want to hear that the SEC defenses were faster, specifically the d-lineman LB's and DE's....they said michigan had the best D in the land...just reminding everyone how laughable that is now...guys like Patrick Willis at Ole Miss and yes Tray Blackmon are better athletes than the LB's in the Big 10...guys like Quentin Groves and Jarvis Moss are not to be found on the Big 10 rosters...

Of course the big 10 is still good and they have their share of great, great players...but you guys that adamantly claimed the Big 10 defensive front 7's were just as fast as LSU, Florida and Auburn ...were wrong...that also ain't to say that your teams couldn't beat a fast defense...it's just saying they better have a game plan for it(like Wisconsin)
March 5, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergabe
What you're saying, gabe, is that you really didn't have a point at all. Besides a tired rant about speed, which, as you adequately noted, is prone to being outcoached, like any other team aspect. No team can just walk into a game and be fast and win; speed has to game plan for bulk, just as bulk has to game plan for speed. One attribute doesn't automatically win games.

The more you talk about speed, which is only one of many aspects of a football team, the more tired the rest of the nation grows of the speed talk. And the nation's reaction to the "WE'RE FAST!" mantra doesn't make you right or persecuted by the other conferences; it just makes you repetitive.
March 5, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.