Save The Rose Bowl
Monday, April 9, 2007 at 08:22PM Yahoo! Sports' Terry Bowden, in his blind haste to establish a college football playoff, gives us this: Boycott the Rose Bowl.
I don't want to get all our Big Ten and Pac-10 readers in a hussy, but many people think it will be those two conferences that ultimately will come between college football and a playoff system. Florida president Bernie Machin, who is spearheading the drive to persuade college presidents to consider a playoff, believes the only real problem will be the Big Ten and the Pac-10 because "they like their sweetheart deal with the Rose Bowl." Maybe fans can visit www.boycotttherosebowl.com, a site that reader David Barnes of Dallas emailed to me.
Is he insane?
Quote "they like their sweetheart deal with the Rose Bowl"
The Rose Bowl is the grand-daddy of them all. It is the most celebrated singular sporting event in the country outside of the Super Bowl. It is history, pageantry, tradition. And desperate playoff honks are now advocating to weaken and/or destroy it. What is wrong with you people?
Yes, the Rose Bowl is lucrative. That's one of the perks of a successful enterprise: it makes money. Those people in turn-of-the-century Pasadena - great Americans that they were - had the foresight to envision a grand and elaborate January postseason game in California. They built the stadium, they marketed it, they marketed the game and the parade and everything else involved and created a tradition unlike anything else. It was dangerous, there were uncertainties, an unclear return on investment but they plunged forward anyway because they had a vision for something grand.
Their vision became an impressive reality. And it made a hell of a lot of money. Money that drove others to jealousy. Jealousy that drove competing bowl games to form the fore-runner to the BCS and eventually the BCS. The moves made an elite handful of bowl games an incredible amount of money but dubiously tampered with the game's rich and longstanding postseason traditions.
And now we've gotten to the point where those unhappy with the BCS and the playoff zealots are demanding a boycott to the Rose Bowl because it's in the way of their silly and misguided playoff adventure? Good grief. Have any of you any taste for this game's great tradition? For the foundations of postseason play? Do you not realize that what makes the game particularly special and memorable is that our postseason is different? Peculiar, even?
Any move towards a playoff only further weakens the very fundamentals of college football: a robust regular season punctuated with postseason pageantry. Our game is about celebration more than it is elimination. It is at its heart a regional game, punctuated with highly dramatic intersectional affairs. At its heart it is about the week-to-week drama more than who is left standing at the end.
Any move towards a playoff is inevitably destructive instead of constructive. Look at the movement now, chastising the Rose Bowl. Clearly emotion has overcome rational thought. Emotion makes bad policy...playoffs are bad policy, and they threaten much of what is so fundamental to the college football game as we have for so long known it.
***
Update: Get the Picture concurs
***
The different types of hp digital camera are launched for the personal home use with the addition of special features. The variety of camera lenses is introduced for the various kinds of the digital cameras according to their size, shape and mechanical system. The main advantage of the wireless camera is that you need not worry about installation of camera and you may use it at anywhere. The camera bags are designed in the stylish and unique way for keeping cameras more safe.
CFR |
55 Comments | 





Reader Comments (55)
pac-10 big-10 ...you need can keep your rose bowl tree and have the winner automatically entered into the final 4...no runnerups allowed into the system...
boycott the rose bowl!
BTW the SEC folks with a nose for history know the Rose Bowl's value in history. Alabama used the game as a launching point for its future success, for example.
Hopefully it should awaken from slumber some of the more passive fans who don't really have a care either way where the issue goes but DO know that angling against the Rose Bowl is something dire and hopefully look poorly upon the overall movement behind it in some measure.
I don't think they thought much of the bowl alliance/coalition etc. stuff either until it was on their front porch saying "come along with us or forever be left out". Oops.
I think both fan bases enjoyed the matchup and the venue itself and easily put aside the supposed "x-place" implications of the game. That's the beauty of bowl games, they're unique entities unto themselves, they need no context other than the matchup itself.
I wish the other 12-team conferences would follow suit.
We got a live one...
A series of one-and-done games will not field a legitimate champion, no.
It's usually meaningless (like almost every other bowl) and since it features the champs of one weak (P-1) and another overrated (B-11) conference, generally boring. Get over yourselves. The rest of college football has had enough of Pac-1 and Big-11 and their media cheerleaders extending the ridiculous poll popularity contests. "Saving" the traditional lineup in a bad bowl game doesn't even register on the interest meter.
2005-2006: 21.7 rating (next closest game 12.9)
2004-2005: 12.4, just behind USC/Oklahoma's 13.7
2003-2004: 14.4, just a fraction behind the "BCS Championship" game in the Sugar Bowl at 14.5
2002-2003: 11.3 for Oklahoma/WSU (the Fiesta with Ohio State/Miami drew a 17.2, the USC/Iowa Orange a 9.7).
Among all BCS games from 1998 to the present, the Rose Bowl has the #1, 6,7,8,9,10, 12, 15 and 18th rated games, basically owning the non-BCS-Championship game ratings in almost every given year.
America LOVES the Rose Bowl.
http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/tvratings
The college game is strong because the action on the field is strong. Every game matters because every game is a celebration. A playoff makes the whole process more mechanical, less soulful, less celebratory.
We've seen what a hyped postseason does for college basketball: the tournament's fun but all anyone remembers about it is filling out the brackets and the final foul. Nobody will be talking about any regular season games from this year, yet in college football you can have a conversation with ease among fellow fans about a supposedly meaningless contest like say, the Wake Forest/Clemson game.
The game's don't evaporate so easily from our memories because each one is a festivity. The lesson from college basketball is that we'll be robbed of that if we go with a playoff. No thanks!
Fact, Florida had less than 25% of the fans at the National Championship game in AZ. In fact, AZ residents spent the weekend wondering if ANY FL fans would show up.
Also, for all your sudden SEC supremacy crap, you were only 1-2 in bowl games vs. the Big Ten this year.
Sheesh.