"Spend a few minutes reading College Football Resource" - Whit Watson, Sun Sports

"Maybe you should start your own blog" - Bruce Feldman, ESPN

"[An] Excellent resource for all things college football. It’s blog index is the definitive listing of the CFB blogosphere ... [A] must-read for fans." - Sports Illustrated (On Campus)

"The big daddy of them all, the nerve center of this twisted college football blogsphere" - The House Rock Built

"Unsurprisingly, College Football Resource has generated some discussion" -Dawg Sports

Top Teams 2008

After Week Seven

  1. Alabama
  2. Penn State
  3. Texas
  4. Oklahoma
  5. Florida
  6. USC
  7. Georgia
  8. LSU
  9. BYU
  10. Missouri
  11. Ohio State
  12. Oklahoma State
  13. Texas Tech
  14. Utah
  15. Kansas
  16. USF
  17. North Carolina
  18. Miami
  19. Boise State
  20. Georgia Tech
Display
RSS
Search CFR
Submission Corner
« Pundit Roundup | Main | Brew Years Eve »
Monday
09Apr2007

Save The Rose Bowl

Yahoo! Sports' Terry Bowden, in his blind haste to establish a college football playoff, gives us this: Boycott the Rose Bowl.

I don't want to get all our Big Ten and Pac-10 readers in a hussy, but many people think it will be those two conferences that ultimately will come between college football and a playoff system. Florida president Bernie Machin, who is spearheading the drive to persuade college presidents to consider a playoff, believes the only real problem will be the Big Ten and the Pac-10 because "they like their sweetheart deal with the Rose Bowl." Maybe fans can visit www.boycotttherosebowl.com, a site that reader David Barnes of Dallas emailed to me.

Is he insane?

Quote "they like their sweetheart deal with the Rose Bowl"

The Rose Bowl is the grand-daddy of them all.  It is the most celebrated singular sporting event in the country outside of the Super Bowl.  It is history, pageantry, tradition.  And desperate playoff honks are now advocating to weaken and/or destroy it.  What is wrong with you people?

Yes, the Rose Bowl is lucrative.  That's one of the perks of a successful enterprise: it makes money.  Those people in turn-of-the-century Pasadena - great Americans that they were - had the foresight to envision a grand and elaborate January postseason game in California.  They built the stadium, they marketed it, they marketed the game and the parade and everything else involved and created a tradition unlike anything else.  It was dangerous, there were uncertainties, an unclear return on investment but they plunged forward anyway because they had a vision for something grand.

Their vision became an impressive reality.  And it made a hell of a lot of money.  Money that drove others to jealousy.  Jealousy that drove competing bowl games to form the fore-runner to the BCS and eventually the BCS.  The moves made an elite handful of bowl games an incredible amount of money but dubiously tampered with the game's rich and longstanding postseason traditions.

And now we've gotten to the point where those unhappy with the BCS and the playoff zealots are demanding a boycott to the Rose Bowl because it's in the way of their silly and misguided playoff adventure?  Good grief.  Have any of you any taste for this game's great tradition?  For the foundations of postseason play?  Do you not realize that what makes the game particularly special and memorable is that our postseason is different?  Peculiar, even?

Any move towards a playoff only further weakens the very fundamentals of college football: a robust regular season punctuated with postseason pageantry.  Our game is about celebration more than it is elimination.  It is at its heart a regional game, punctuated with highly dramatic intersectional affairs.  At its heart it is about the week-to-week drama more than who is left standing at the end.

Any move towards a playoff is inevitably destructive instead of constructive.  Look at the movement now, chastising the Rose Bowl.  Clearly emotion has overcome rational thought.  Emotion makes bad policy...playoffs are bad policy, and they threaten much of what is so fundamental to the college football game as we have for so long known it.

***
Update: Get the Picture concurs

***

The different types of hp digital camera are launched for the personal home use with the addition of special features.  The variety of camera lenses is introduced for the various kinds of the digital cameras according to their size, shape and mechanical system.  The main advantage of the wireless camera is that you need not worry about installation of camera and you may use it at anywhere.  The camera bags are designed in the stylish and unique way for keeping cameras more safe. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (55)

I agree with my old coach Bowden on this one. Boycott that yankee bowl.Your sentiment is hypocrtical, the rose bowl was anti-tradition when it started, they had been having nice regular seasons for years before those newfangled bowls came along...who needs their fancy trips to sunny locations? football ain't about going to california...The rose bowl is like an old tree in the forest, full of parasites, half rotten home to many squirels and other varmint that live off of it. It is gonna die, it is blocking the sunlight for younger trees of the next generation ,trees that aren't driled through with termites...we are humans who need to saw that tree down while we can still salvage some of the wood at the sawmill and allow our new better hybrid trees to flourish.

pac-10 big-10 ...you need can keep your rose bowl tree and have the winner automatically entered into the final 4...no runnerups allowed into the system...


boycott the rose bowl!
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergabe
I hope the rest of the country doesn't lump the SEC or all UF fans in with Machen. On a related note, maybe this bit of Rose Bowl insanity will somehow give the zealots pause to think about the realistic impact of that for which they fight...lets boycott that unweildy torch thing at the next Olympics...it would be more exciting if we moved the Masters somewhere else; lets throw out that hokey music they play in the seventh inning at all the baseball games...now that I think about it, Christmas is pretty annoying as well...
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLtrain
Well, if the presentation at the website www.boycotttherosebowl.com is any indication of how organized the movement to boycott the Rose Bowl is, I'd say they don't have much to worry about in Pasadena...
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSenator Blutarsky
Anti-tradition? There was no tradition when it started.

BTW the SEC folks with a nose for history know the Rose Bowl's value in history. Alabama used the game as a launching point for its future success, for example.
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
I'm not sure it will give them pause, but I think it reveals the true colors of those on the extreme edge of those pushing for a playoff.

Hopefully it should awaken from slumber some of the more passive fans who don't really have a care either way where the issue goes but DO know that angling against the Rose Bowl is something dire and hopefully look poorly upon the overall movement behind it in some measure.
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
For now they don't. You never know when the political winds can change though.

I don't think they thought much of the bowl alliance/coalition etc. stuff either until it was on their front porch saying "come along with us or forever be left out". Oops.
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
Alabama...rose bowl....exactly. Trust me, anyone who has ever lived in Alabama knows that the tide went to the rose bowl and Auburn didn't and that is why they have some much tradishun...so much tradishun that they have to shovel it off the sidewalks all over the capstone. yep, boycott the rose bowl
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergabe
As an Iowa fan, I wouldn't mind if the Big Ten and Pac-10 left the BCS behind, formed a league, expanded to 12 members each, played round robin schedules, and the champions met in the league's Super Bowl, the Rose Bowl. However, short of that, the Rose Bowl is just a glorified consolation game with no more value than the third place game the NCAA Tournament once had. Neither Michigan or USC wanted to be there last year. The fact that college football has been able to dress up its 3rd place, 5th place, 7th place, and so on games with bowl names doesn't really make them count more than that.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterChad
The Rose Bowl was not a "third place" game. That's absurb. It was yet another game in a several decades-long battle between USC and Michigan.

I think both fan bases enjoyed the matchup and the venue itself and easily put aside the supposed "x-place" implications of the game. That's the beauty of bowl games, they're unique entities unto themselves, they need no context other than the matchup itself.
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
Also, as far as the leagues, if anything I'd have the Big Ten drop Penn State and return to its original configuration and follow the Pac-10 in playing a round-robin conference schedule.

I wish the other 12-team conferences would follow suit.
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
As a Michigan fan, I wasn't upset that Michigan was in the Rose Bowl; I was upset that the BCS and the push for one shining "champion" devalued what was a classic, quality matchup in the Rose Bowl.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBurrill
this is ridiculous. logic is the root of intelligence. a playoff isn't the logical way to find a champion? seriously? what a bunch of munsons. piss on the rose bowl.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergoodthinkin
"piss on the Rose Bowl"

We got a live one...

A series of one-and-done games will not field a legitimate champion, no.
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
Oh, get a grip. Your own regional nonsense is showing Nobody outside of the Pac-1, Big-11 or ABCESPN (I suppose Alabama is the exception, but living in the distant past is apparently in their DNA) gives a roaring rip about the Rose Bowl. It's just another bowl game, and not a particularly interesting one most years (2004-5 obviously excepted--and they had to import Texas to get a good matchup in both of those years).

It's usually meaningless (like almost every other bowl) and since it features the champs of one weak (P-1) and another overrated (B-11) conference, generally boring. Get over yourselves. The rest of college football has had enough of Pac-1 and Big-11 and their media cheerleaders extending the ridiculous poll popularity contests. "Saving" the traditional lineup in a bad bowl game doesn't even register on the interest meter.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterFlibbetigibbet
goodthinkin - since you took the time to "contribute," you may want to take the time and go back through previous posts on this subject that may clarify that the answer to your purportedly rhetorical question is, in fact, no.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLtrain
Nobody cares about the Rose Bowl?

2005-2006: 21.7 rating (next closest game 12.9)
2004-2005: 12.4, just behind USC/Oklahoma's 13.7
2003-2004: 14.4, just a fraction behind the "BCS Championship" game in the Sugar Bowl at 14.5
2002-2003: 11.3 for Oklahoma/WSU (the Fiesta with Ohio State/Miami drew a 17.2, the USC/Iowa Orange a 9.7).

Among all BCS games from 1998 to the present, the Rose Bowl has the #1, 6,7,8,9,10, 12, 15 and 18th rated games, basically owning the non-BCS-Championship game ratings in almost every given year.

America LOVES the Rose Bowl.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/tvratings
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-plaschke3jan03,1,4850988,full.column?coll=la-utilities-sports&ctrack=3&cset=true

The college game is strong because the action on the field is strong. Every game matters because every game is a celebration. A playoff makes the whole process more mechanical, less soulful, less celebratory.

We've seen what a hyped postseason does for college basketball: the tournament's fun but all anyone remembers about it is filling out the brackets and the final foul. Nobody will be talking about any regular season games from this year, yet in college football you can have a conversation with ease among fellow fans about a supposedly meaningless contest like say, the Wake Forest/Clemson game.

The game's don't evaporate so easily from our memories because each one is a festivity. The lesson from college basketball is that we'll be robbed of that if we go with a playoff. No thanks!
April 10, 2007 | Registered CommenterCFR
Maybe if you SEC fans could actually hitch up your sedans from the 60's and make it enmass to a bowl game outside of the state of FL or GA, you would be taken seriously.
Fact, Florida had less than 25% of the fans at the National Championship game in AZ. In fact, AZ residents spent the weekend wondering if ANY FL fans would show up.
Also, for all your sudden SEC supremacy crap, you were only 1-2 in bowl games vs. the Big Ten this year.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterugottabekidding
Of all the arguments against a playoff, this is, by far, the weakest I've ever seen. Two puffed-up, one- or two-team conferences and their pet TV network crying about losing their sweetheart deal for a bowl game. What would the Sugar Bowl or Orange Bowl ratings be like if ESPN spent months relentlessly flogging them?

Sheesh.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterWill Collier
And another thing--the ratings for ANY college football playoff game (including the first rounds) would dwarf any non-BCS-final Rose Bowl, and you guys know it. Which is another reason why you'd rather take your run-down dump in Pasadena and go home than show up for a non-subjective playoff.
April 10, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterWill Collier

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.